Exploring the students’ perception on the use of teaching factory method in English learning
Article Sidebar
-
TEFA, English learning, students' perception
Abstract
The Economic development of a country is determined by the main factor, the human resources competitiveness. In preparing competent human resources, the strategic program to be undertaken by the government is to align competencies of vocational higher education students with the needs of industrial competence. As a result, link and match between industry and higher-level vocational education could be achieved. The solution to prepare students to have competencies that are in accordance with industrial competence is by giving teaching factory (TEFA) method. It is a concept that aims to align manufacturing teaching to the needs of industrial practice. This study focuses on students’ perceptions on the use of teaching factory method in English learning, especially English for hotel and restaurant. This study adopts qualitative approach. Data were collected using questionnaires and interviews. The findings in this study reveal students' perceptions and responses on the use of teaching factory method. It shows that many of the students feel enthusiasm in attending English for hotel and restaurant using teaching factory method. It also shows that many of the students express that learning in English for hotel and restaurant encourage them to be actively participated in learning process. It can be concluded that most of the students have a positive impression about the use of teaching factory method in English learning, especially English for hotel and restaurant.
Full text article
References
Adam, L. (2017). Membangun Daya Saing Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Melalui Peningkatan Produktivitas. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 11(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v11i2.205
Aida, Z., & Hidajat, S. T. (2020). Implementasi Pembelajaran Teaching Factory Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Keahlian Siswa Tata Boga Di Smkn 3 Kota Bengkulu. Triadik, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.33369/triadik.v18i2.11392
Amrullah, A., Lail, H., & Sumayani, S. R. (2023). The Efl students’ perspectives on the usefulness of ict-based learning. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v2i1.6
Auzina-Emsina, A. (2014). Labour Productivity, Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness in Post-crisis Period. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.195
Budiana, K. M. (2021). The students’ perception on the use of computer assisted language learning. In Journal of Applied Studies in Language (Vol. 5, Issue 1). http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASLhttp://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research [With Study Guide]. Pearson.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Vokasi. (2020). “Program Kerja Tahun 2021 Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Vokasi,” Kemendikbud Dirjen Vokasi. Jakarta: Indonesia, 2020.
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi, “Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi Menghadapi Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” Kemristekdikti, Jakarta, Indonesia, April 2019.
Khoiron, A. M. (2016). THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHING FACTORY LEARNING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION TO THE STUDENTS’ OCCUPATIONAL READINESS. In Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (Vol. 23, Issue 2).
Kusmintarti, A., Ismanu, S., Sulasari, A., & Evelina, T.Y. (2022). Teaching factory learning model to improve student’s entrepreneurship competencies. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 28(S1), 1-19.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Pramana, Cipta & Chamidah, Dina & Suyatno, Suyatno & Renadi, Faiza. (2021). Strategies to Improved Education Quality in Indonesia: A Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 12. 1977-1994.
Sharp, C. A. (2003). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). In Evaluation Journal of Australasia (Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 60–61). https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0300300213.